If you choose ZStandard then it is recommended to use a normal or lower compression level. ZStandard has been implemented with performance, and not high compression levels, in mind. Choose this if performance is important, but note that it can only be used with multi-zip, i.e. Like ZStandard, XZ can only be used with multi-zip, i.e. It is probably better to choose LZMA instead, except if you are using the highest compression levels, as LZMA requires a large amount of free memory. XZ and LZMA2 have the worst performance but the best compression. However, if you are using SyncBackSE or SyncBackPro, then you should choose Deflate64 instead of Deflate as the performance is very similar but the compression is higher with Deflate64. WinZip, 7zip, WinRAR, etc.ĭeflate has the worst compression, but it is fast. The example file is text (not binary) and has an uncompressed size of 100,000,000 bytes.Īll the compression methods (except for BWT) are compatible with various compression utilities, e.g. The table below shows the results of using different compression methods and levels with an example file (the file text8 was used) and SyncBackPro. Modified on: Tue, 10 Oct, 2023 at 1:54 PM Solution home Technical Articles Compression and Encryption Comparison of compression methods and levels
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |